SPE Judging Form

Skip to content

GlueUp Member Login

Members Library

Who We Are
- History
- Leadership
What We Do
How To Get Started
Blogs
Get Connected
Chapter Resources

Who We Are
- History
- Leadership
What We Do
How To Get Started
Blogs
Get Connected
Chapter Resources

Join Now

JCI USA SPE Judging Form

JCI USA Single Project Entry Judging Form

Please use the following form submission for judging assigned Single Project Entries for the 2025 JCI USA Awards Season. Rating Scale for all statements: 1 = Strongly Disagree through 5 = Strongly Agree. Please enter a number 1-5 for each of the options below.

Judge's Name(Required)

First Last

Project Name(Required)

Chapter(Required)

State Organization(Required)

Project Category(Required)

Best Local Peace Project

Inter-Organization Collaboration

Local Community Empowerment

Local Economic Development

Local Global Goals

Local Growth and Development

Local Personal Skills Development

Long-Term Community Development

Section One: Project Overview & Purpose

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The project's purpose and objectives were clearly defined.(Required)

The overview gives a complete and meaningful description of what occurred.(Required)

The scope of the project aligns with its stated purpose.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Two: Membership Growth Impact

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The project demonstrates clear and measurable membership growth.(Required)

The submission clearly explains how membership growth was targeted.(Required)

The chapter/state organization benefited beyond just raw membership numbers.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Three: Objectives, Planning, & Execution

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

Project objectives were clearly defined and achievable.(Required)

The project plan appears well thought out and logical.(Required)

The project clearly aligns with the JCI USA Plan of Action.(Required)

The project facilitated development of enterprising young leaders.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Four: Brand Awareness

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The project increased awareness of JCI with future members.(Required)

The project raised awareness of the JCI brand in the community.(Required)

The project increased awareness of JCI with sponsors or government officials.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Five: Long-Term Impact

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The expected long-term impact is clearly described.(Required)

The submission shows realistic reflection on how results could be improved.(Required)

The project's outcomes appear sustainable beyond the project period.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Six: Financial Impact

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The financial outcome (surplus/loss) is clearly reported.(Required)

The submission explains how any surplus will be used to grow the organization.(Required)

The budget was an effective financial guide for the project.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Seven: Member & Stakeholder Value

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The project clearly brought value to members.(Required)

The number of members engaged is meaningful and appropriate.(Required)

Stakeholders (internal and external) benefited from the project.(Required)

Optional Comment

Section Eight: Overall Project Impact & Excellence

Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The project clearly achieved its intended purpose.(Required)

The project demonstrates meaningful overall impact.(Required)

The project outcomes justify the time, resources, and effort involved.(Required)

Taken as a whole, this project stands out among similar submissions.(Required)

Overall Judge Assessment(Required)

Exceptional: A model project that sets a benchmark for others

Strong: A well-executed project with clear impact

Satisfactory: Met expectations with moderate impact

Limited: Impact was unclear or underdeveloped

Please select ONE

Was there a video submission?(Required)

Yes

No

Overall Feedback(Required)

What most influenced your overall assessment of this project?

Attestaton(Required)

I have reviewed this project submission in full.
I evaluated this project fairly, objectively, and to the best of my ability.
I applied the scoring criteria consistently and without bias.
The scores and comments submitted reflect my honest and professional judgment.

I attest that the above is true

Explore

About JCI USA
Leadership
Blog
How We Take Action

Learn

Leadership Development
Impact Projects
International Opportunities
National Events

Engage

Getting Started
Join a Chapter
Leadership Team
Careers

Connect

Enter Your Email Address

Facebook Instagram Linkedin

Youtube

Scroll to Top